That switch is either on or off, not to detect levels.   They are good 
switches though.  Use them at work in a horrible  corrosive environment and 
have 
only seen one bad one in 10+ years of  use.

Kevin.




In a message dated 2/13/2012 7:04:40 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

The fuel  level swtich I use is from http://fluidswitch.com/pages/fs11.htm

Seems  to do well

Joe

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Jeff Scott  <[email protected]> wrote:

> The plate type of capacitance  transducers are known for reading pretty
> inaccurately due to the  sloshing in the tanks. The feedback I have heard 
is
> that they work  just fine on the ground, but as soon as the plane is 
moving
> and  bouncing around the fuel gauges become relatively useless. If someone
>  else has been flying with them and has a different experience, I'd  sure
> like to hear it.
>
>  I did install capacitance  gauges in my KR. I used the transducers from
> Westach, which are a 1/4"  aluminum tube with a wire suspended in the 
center
> that is used to  measure the capacitance. I found the tube type 
transducers
> to be  accurate and work quite well in rough air. I have had a history of
> the  Westach transducers losing the ground where the ground wire is 
riveted
>  onto the 1/4" tube with a cheap pop rivet, but addressed that issue by
>  wrapping and zipping them down tight with some .020 safety wire. I've  
been
> flying with these gauges in my KR for 15 years now. It's worth  noting 
that
> the more modern Westach transducers come with the ground  wire already
> wrapped around the tube at the  rivet.
>
>  Craig, my fuel system is set up similar to yours  with a 9 gallon header
> and two 6 gallon aux tanks that get transferred  to the header. Maybe it's
> just me, but in 900 hours I have never  failed to look at the fuel gauge 
and
> transfer fuel from the wings to  the header. In fact, it is rare for me to
> ever allow the header to go  below 1/2 tank until after the wing tanks are
> dry. However, I have  forgotten to shut off the tranfer pumps a few times,
> so was pumping  excess fuel to the header which was sending it overboard.
> Don't try to  over think it as all the warnings can become a distraction.
> You may  find yourself responding to warnings that may not necessarily be 
as
>  critical as just flying the plane first. The only annunciator I have in  
my
> plane is the traffic proximity warning on my PCAS. That's one that  gets 
my
> attention, but after more than one near miss while in cruise  flight, I 
want
> it to get my attention.
>
>  Jeff  Scott
>  Los Alamos, NM
>
> ----- Original Message  -----
> From: Craig Williams
> Sent: 02/11/12 04:36 PM
> To:  KRnet
> Subject: Re: KR> annunciators box
>
>  Mark  You may want to look at Jim Weirs (June 2000 kitplanes) design for 
a
>  capacitive fuel gauge. It's what I am going to use. No moving parts and  
no
> need to ever go back in the tank. It also has an alarm for low  fuel. That
> will be useful for me because I do not plan on having and  external fill
> capability on the mains, all fuel goes through the aux  and transfers to 
the
> mains via a pump.  http://www.rst-engr.com/kitplanes/ Although I will have
> the low fuel  alarm I decided to build the timer circuit to alert me every
> hour to  transfer fuel. The 0-200 will burn my mains down to half full 
each
>  hour. Then I flip on the pump switch and watch the gauge climb back to  
full
> and shut her off. (<2 min) If fuel won't transfer then I have  one hour to
> fix it or land. Craig www.kr2seafury  ________________________________ 
From:
> Mark Langford  <[email protected]> To: KRnet <[email protected]> Sent:  
Saturday,
> February 11, 2012 2:44 PM Subject: Re: KR> annunciators  box The reason I
> have a fuel transfer LED (and it's just green and  doesn't flash) is 
purely
> for information that the pump really is  getting power, and that it shuts
> off automatically when it's supposed  to, after about three minutes. I 
agree
> that the automatic level switch  makes a lot of sense, but I've got two 
dead
> fuel level sensors in two  different tanks in my plane, both of which 
lasted
> a mater of weeks  before they croaked, so I hope folks choose better than 
I
> did in that  regard (Compac Engineering). I'd be tempted to find an
> automotive  (either factory or aftermarket) level sensor that has the 
extra
>  connection for a "low fuel" light, and use that to trigger a warning  
light,
> just like in your car. But I've found in my plane that I never,  not once,
> ran the main tank out of fuel, for the reasons Matt  mentioned....the fuel
> gauge in the header tank is something I glance  at quite often, and when 
it
> drops to the point that it could hold  another couple of gallons, I shoot 
it
> over there. The "fuel transfer"  light is just to let me know if the pump 
is
> receiving power or not  (and hopefully working). That's not to say that I
> didn't know what the  gauge looked like when it was dead empty. Part of my
> annual inspection  is to prop the tail up to flying angle and run the fuel
> out, to make  sure the gauge is still accurate, and that I know how it 
looks
> just  before it gets there. As much as I don't like fuel in the cabin, I
>  have to admit that the Swift has a fuel system I could like in a KR. It  
has
> an aluminum "header" box that holds about a quart of fuel, right  under 
the
> seats. It has a standpipe sticking out the top, into which a  cork float
> twists a magnet that acts on a gauge that sticks out  between the seats
> (like a boat fuel tank, I'm told). This aluminum box  is plumbed to the 
two
> wing tanks, always receiving fuel from both  tanks by gravity, and the 
fuel
> is then pumped from the aluminum box to  the carb by a mechanical and/or
> electric pump. Gravity means no such  thing as fuel left in either tank 
when
> it finally runs dry. This way,  only one water/trash drain is needed. It's
> remoted to a pull knob at  the firewall via cable. The fuel outlet runs
> through a large fine  screen before it can be sucked out of the header and
> to the carb.  Another advantage to this system is that replacing the gauge
> is easily  done in minutes with four screws, from inside the cabin, and
> without  even draining the fuel! Of course my Swift's gauge has been
> operating  flawlessly for 65 years One of the many nice things about the 
EIS
> is  the programmable fuel remaining. I have mine set to alarm at 2.3  
gallons
> (more than a half hour at cruise), but then that is based on  the 
assumption
> that I've been smart enough to empty the aux wing tanks  into the header
> tank via fuel transfer. With the Swift system, that  issue doesn't exist,
> and I'd only need two electric pumps (main and  backup), rather than four
> (add a pump for each aux tank)... Mark  Langford ML at N56ML.com website 
at
>  
http://www.N56ML.com--------------------------------------------------------
>  _______________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at
>  http://mylist.net/private/krnet/ to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a
>  message to [email protected] please see other KRnet info at
>  http://www.krnet.org/info.html _______________________________________
>  Search the KRnet Archives at http://mylist.net/private/krnet/ to
>  UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to [email protected]  please
> see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>  _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at  http://mylist.net/private/krnet/
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a  message to [email protected]
> please see other KRnet info at  http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>



-- 
Jose  Fuentes
Founding Father (one of and former Vice Prez) of Capital City.NET  User's
Group
Former Microsoft  MVP
http://blogs.aspadvice.com/jfuentes
_______________________________________
Search  the KRnet Archives at http://mylist.net/private/krnet/ 
to UNsubscribe from  KRnet, send a message to [email protected]
please see other KRnet info  at http://www.krnet.org/info.html

Reply via email to