And thus the reason for the Free Bird. On Fri, Nov 3, 2023, 9:52 AM John Gotschall via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote:
> I viewed the agreement as written acknowledgement of existing copyright > law, with the added restriction of 1 set of plans per plane. > > Breach of contract (the agreement to build one plane per plan set) would > be enforced by civil action taken by the copyright holder and beneficiary > of that covenant that makes another plan sale eminent (profitable). Where > breaking the agreement and thereby costing the beneficiary the loss of > profit from a plans sale is the cause of the damages to the beneficiary. > > I am not a lawyer, but that's the impression I got from my interactions > when I purchased my plan sets. I was OK with those restrictions and so > accepted the conditions. My other option, I felt, was to not make the > purchases. > > Were I to sell them I would inform the buyer of the covenant, same as I > would when selling a real estate parcel encumbered by an easement. Who > would make the attempt to sell without making the buyer aware of > encumbrances/easements or restrictions? A civil action for damages > resulting from behavior like that seems like a slam dunk in my (non lawyer) > opinion. > > There are likely ways to get around it, ask your lawyer. But why? Maybe > the plans are hard to find, but there are sets out there. Just like rare > coins and lake la-4s. > > jg > > > >> >> -- > KRnet mailing list > KRnet@list.krnet.org > https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet >
-- KRnet mailing list KRnet@list.krnet.org https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
