On 11/3/2023 8:52 AM, John Gotschall via KRnet wrote:
I viewed the agreement as written acknowledgement of existing
copyright law, with the added restriction of 1 set of plans per plane.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I'm thinking the copyrite issue and building one airplane per set of
plans are two different issues but I agree with your point of the seller
trying to protect their revenue stream. But like I stated, who is going
to know and who would pay an attorney $1000 to recoup $250? Making
copies of the plans and selling would become an entirely different
issue. It really comes down to the character of the buyer and their
willingness to abide by the agreement they made and signed to build one
airplane with one set of plans. Playing fair is most always the right
thing to do.
Larry Flesner
--
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet
