>>>>> "Roland" == Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> writes:
>> And in those cases, have you added the appropriate Copyright to each
>> of those files?
Roland> What do you mean with "appropriate Copyright"[...]? AFAIK we do
Roland> not need (and should not need) to add any CDDL license to the
Roland> AST codebase since we have a permission to contribute any
Roland> Solaris code to upstream (Mike Kupfer can explain that AFAIK
Roland> better) under their own license ("CPL") which AFAIK covers any
Roland> tree-local modifications. The new tests and demo code has a CDDL
Roland> license.
Modified AST code keeps the AST license (no CDDL). This is no different
from any other third-party code that we modify for Solaris.
Does ATT require that copyright on contributions be assigned to ATT? If
not, then files that we touch for Solaris should have a Sun copyright.
Roland, I believe you can also put a copyright statement on for
yourself, too.
mike
