Roland Mainz wrote: > > Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > The point isn't to choose my wording, but to keep it general so that we > > > > don't have to update it too much. > > > > > > Ok... > > > ... is there anything else which needs to be changed ? > > > > For that wad, it otherwise looks good (from my quick scan). I still have > > to respond to your latest email on the main code review thread, but I need > > to dig through the workspace a bit before answering -- hence the delay. > > I will get to it by Monday at latest. > > Ok...
BTW: Can I commit the patch to the Subversion tree if it's Ok ? I'd like to generate new demo/test binaries which match the current reviewed tree if possible... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
