Peter Memishian wrote: [snip] > That's not checked into the tree; I think that comes from the build > environment itself.
Right... but who or what sets the matching flag in the build ? > > It is only "nightly" itself or are there any other scripts which depend > > on "RELEASE", too ? > > A number of things under usr/src/tools are aware of RELEASE -- and > probably a lot of other stuff that's been built over the years. Is there a way to hunt down all consumers of RELEASE ? > > Is there any rule against global, single-word Makefile variables with > > less then four letters in the Makefile style guide yet ? > > No :-) Should I file a bug/RFE to get something like that added (e.g. "...any variable added to an OS/Net Makefile which is visible/used by multiple makefiles should be named using more than one word and have at least four characters..." or something like that (that still misses things like "namespaces" etc.)) ? [snip] > > +# common CPP flags for libshell consumers (ksh, shcomp etc.) > > I thought shcomp wasn't part of this putback? Uhm...right... ... but technically only the Makefiles are missing (and the "javaexec"-like kernel module which recognizes compiled shell code) - the "core" lives in libshell anyway (since ksh93 does the compiling internally anyway) and shcomp.c is part of this putback... --- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
