On 7/4/07, Peter Memishian <peter.memishian at sun.com> wrote: > * 113-143: Please reformat to be 80-column friendly.
Why? It may be appropriate for the 60' of the last century but today is 2007! /. had recently an article about this problem: http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/07/07/07/1931246.shtml "Dating back to the venerable DEC VT100, the 80 column terminal has served us well for over 25 years. Even now, many open source projects and common conventions require lines of code and documentation to fit on that terminal. I am not alone, judging by code I've seen in and out of the open source world, in finding that number insufficient for coding, much less more verbose writing. Given that modern graphical displays (and all popular editors) are capable of far more, is it time we came up with a new standard-sized terminal? If so, what should the new standard be?" After lots of discussion it looks that a 132-column limit may be better for humans and quality of the code Josh
