Dong, Eddie wrote: > Gregory Haskins wrote: > >> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote: >> >> >> >>> Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for >>> irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger. >>> >> I think what Avi is saying is this can be generalized as a separate >> feature independent of in-kernel-PIC. Since Avi and I are both >> advocating a separate capability for in-kernel-HLT, you >> wouldn't need to >> have a stubbed irqchip_in_kernel. Rather, you should have a flag that >> indicates whether userspace enabled the HLT capability or not. >> > > Then Avi need to check in your patch in user level to remove the race > condition, otherwise > the patch does nothing and just some dead code. > > Avi: > Can u have a double check to see what you want to do. I am fine > with either of them. >
Like Gregory said: we check in the hlt patch to the kernel, and the race removal + use the new feature patch for userspace. Gregory, can you repost that patch please? Eddie, please test both with and without the userspace patch. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
