On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:43:19PM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Unfortunately, we can't just "fake emulate" MSR_K7_PERFCTR[0-3] like we are
> doing for MSR_K7_EVNTSEL[0-3]; if they are there, linux expects to be able to
> put values into them.  I think the correct solution here is to emulate
> MSR_K7_PERFCTR[0-3] and MSR_K7_EVNTSEL[0-3] for real.  I'm working on a patch 
> to
> do this now.

We already discussed the emulation of the performance counter registers
in the past. The conclusion is, that we loose live migration with that
emulation because performance monitoring is implemented differently
between AMD and Intel systems. Maybe discarding _any_ writes to
the performance counter MSRs will fix the guest crash. What we should
not do is injecting GPF on zero writes to the MSRs because that will
break Windows XP 64bit installation.

Joerg

-- 
           |           AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
 Operating |         Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
 System    |                  Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
 Research  |              General Partner authorized to represent:
 Center    |             AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
           | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to