On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:17:37AM -0400, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > We already discussed the emulation of the performance counter registers
> > in the past. The conclusion is, that we loose live migration with that
> > emulation because performance monitoring is implemented differently
> > between AMD and Intel systems. Maybe discarding _any_ writes to
> > the performance counter MSRs will fix the guest crash. What we should
> > not do is injecting GPF on zero writes to the MSRs because that will
> > break Windows XP 64bit installation.
>
> OK, yeah, I read some of those threads over the weekend. It is a larger
> problem than just this crash, and probably one to be solved later.
> I have attached a patch which just discards all writes, as you suggested;
> this allows my RHEL-4 guest to successfully boot, although obviously the NMI
> watchdog which it thinks it set up is not actually working. Joerg, can you
> test
> this on your 64-bit Windows XP guest to make sure it is still working?
XP 64 bit installs and works fine with your patch.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
