On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 10:23 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > What about virtio? didn't try it yet.
> Also, which emulated is this? the default > > That CPU utilization is extremely high and somewhat illogical if native > w/vt-d has almost no CPU impact. Have you run oprofile yet or have any > insight into where CPU is being burnt? > > What does kvm_stat look like? I wonder if there are a large number of > PIO exits. What does the interrupt count look like on native vs. KVM > with VT-d? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > These are all good points and questions, I agree that we need to take a deeper look into the performance issues, but I think that we need to merge with the main KVM tree first. Regards, Ben -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
