Oliver Rath <rath68 <at> web.de> writes: > > Im looking for an abillity seeing vt-capability of Intel-processors by > there name :-/ > > I.e. T7200 has vt, T3400 has not. Exists a rule for the naming scheme > seeing vt-capability? Alternatively, exists a matrix anywhere in the net > for this?
Browse http://processorfinder.intel.com - Intel VT is reflected by the presence of "Intel® Virtualization Technology" in the supported feature list. T7200: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL9SL T3400: http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLB3P > Im tired searching for vt-capability for every new OEM-intel-processor. > On intel-site _did_ exist a pdf-table (not all processors, but most of > T-series), but it seems to be removed. You are probably talking about the price list PDF file at http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm I too am very annoyed that so many entry-level and medium-level Intel processors don't seem to support Intel VT. For example the less expensive one supporting VT is the Core 2 Duo E8400 at $163. Whereas in the case of AMD even their cheap $40 processors support AMD-V. -marc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
