On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:39:39PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 07:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>
> >> But I don't see the point. If you look at my repository, there's
> >The point is that C++ is ugly language. The short code Avi sent remind
> >me perl (aka line noise). It is almost impossible to parse it into
> >what code it actually does. Most symbols are there for C++ syntax not
> >functionality.
>
> No. They're there for error handling. A C++ wrapper, doesn't add
> any functionality, so you can say that all of the lines of codes do
> nothing and are just syntax. But they do allow you to pair init and
> uninit (in the constructor and destructor). When you use the
> wrapper (as opposed to the bare C interface) you get the value by
> not having to code long error handling sequences (with a high
> probability of getting them wrong and never finding out in testing).
>
So how errors are handled there? By throwing exceptions? Sorry this is
not error "handling".
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
