2010/12/6 Andras Timar <[email protected]>: > See: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/doc/l10n.txt
Andras, this is in reference to the referenced document: Is this document really representing the opinion of the LO community and the native-lang teams? I especially like the first footnote, a reference to one's own blog and a survey from 2004? Should LO even have online help and manuals, if those numbers are representative? Why have help and manuals, maybe even the GUI can be limited to icons only, so no translation is necessary and lang-teams get obsolete? If there are build issues etc. with different language versions they should be resolved in accord with the lang teams, not in view of only cutting the building and downloading costs. If it is not possible to offer full 100% localized builds at this time, then LO should say openly that 3.3 will be an English only version and that the localized versions will follow with the next version, 3.4 or 4.0 or whatever its version is. And what is wrong with providing only EN builds and different lang-packs for Windows as is the case with other languages? Lp, m. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/l10n/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
