I think one problem with the errata process is that the you have to be an AD in order to validate or reject them. The WG chairs should also have the authority to summarily reject errata - especially the nuisance errata that are being submitted these days. Thanks, Acee On Jun 12, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Jakob Heitz wrote:
> This is not necessary. The original is correct grammar. > "be" is being used in the subjunctive form. > > A more modern alternative might be "If a particular host is desired to be in > multiple virtual sites,", but the original is correct, so why bother? > > -- > Jakob Heitz. > > > On Jun 12, 2013, at 1:58 AM, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4364, >> "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4364&eid=3647 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Bharat Joshi <[email protected]> >> >> Section: 3.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> If it is desired to have a particular host be in multiple virtual sites, >> then that host must determine, for each packet, which virtual site the >> packet is associated with. >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> If it is desired to have a particular host to be in multiple virtual sites, >> then that host must determine, for each packet, which virtual site the >> packet is associated with. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> 'host be' should be 'host to be' >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC4364 (draft-ietf-l3vpn-rfc2547bis-03) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) >> Publication Date : February 2006 >> Author(s) : E. Rosen, Y. Rekhter >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks INT >> Area : Internet >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG
