Hi Brain, >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> While reading, I felt that adding a 'to' here make things more clearer. > >It does make things clearer, but the original wording is correct. > >> >> As you mentioned that the existing one is correct, so its ok. >> > >I believe that holds for all three errata opened on this document. >Unless someone objects, I will mark all three (3647, 3648, & 3649) as >"Rejected".
I think Errata 3647 and 3648 are making things more readable so if you think that the current text is ok then may be you can reject them. Errata 3649 is more of a typo which I think should be fixed. Regards, Bharat **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
