Hi Brian, 2013-06-12, Brian Haberman: >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> While reading, I felt that adding a 'to' here make things more clearer. > > It does make things clearer, but the original wording is correct. > >> >> As you mentioned that the existing one is correct, so its ok. >> > > I believe that holds for all three errata opened on this document. > Unless someone objects, I will mark all three (3647, 3648, & 3649) as > "Rejected".
3649 is actually correcting a real typo. -Thomas _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
