2011: A Brave New DystopiaBy Chris Hedges




        
                The two greatest visions of a future 
dystopia were George Orwell’s “1984” and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New 
World.” The debate, between those who watched our descent towards 
corporate totalitarianism, was who was right. Would we be, as Orwell 
wrote, dominated by a repressive surveillance and security state that 
used crude and violent forms of control? Or would we be, as Huxley 
envisioned, entranced by entertainment and spectacle, captivated by 
technology and seduced by profligate consumption to embrace our own 
oppression? It turns out Orwell and Huxley were both right. Huxley saw 
the first stage of our enslavement. Orwell saw the second.

We have been gradually disempowered by a 
corporate state that, as Huxley foresaw, seduced and manipulated us 
through sensual gratification, cheap mass-produced goods, boundless 
credit, political theater and amusement. While we were entertained, the 
regulations that once kept predatory corporate power in check were 
dismantled, the laws that once protected us were rewritten and we were 
impoverished. Now that credit is drying up, good jobs for the working 
class are gone forever and mass-produced goods are unaffordable, we find
 ourselves transported from “Brave New World” to “1984.” The state, 
crippled by massive deficits, endless war and corporate malfeasance, is 
sliding toward bankruptcy. It is time for Big Brother to take over from 
Huxley’s feelies, the orgy-porgy and the centrifugal bumble-puppy. We 
are moving from a society where we are skillfully manipulated by lies 
and illusions to one where we are overtly controlled.  

Orwell warned of a world where books were 
banned. Huxley warned of a world where no one wanted to read books. 
Orwell warned of a state of permanent war and fear. Huxley warned of a 
culture diverted by mindless pleasure. Orwell warned of a state where 
every conversation and thought was monitored and dissent was brutally 
punished. Huxley warned of a state where a population, preoccupied by 
trivia and gossip, no longer cared about truth or information. Orwell 
saw us frightened into submission. Huxley saw us seduced into 
submission. But Huxley, we are discovering, was merely the prelude to 
Orwell. Huxley understood the process by which we would be complicit in 
our own enslavement. Orwell understood the enslavement. Now that the 
corporate coup is over, we stand naked and defenseless. We are beginning
 to understand, as Karl Marx knew, that unfettered and unregulated 
capitalism is a brutal and revolutionary force that exploits human 
beings and the natural world until exhaustion or collapse.  

“The Party seeks power entirely for its own
 sake,” Orwell wrote in “1984.”  “We are not interested in the good of 
others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long 
life or happiness: only power, pure power. What pure power means you 
will understand presently. We are different from all the oligarchies of 
the past, in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those 
who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis 
and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but 
they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They 
pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power 
unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just round the corner there
 lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not 
like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of 
relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not 
establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes 
the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of 
persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object
 of power is power.”

The political philosopher Sheldon Wolin 
uses the term “inverted totalitarianism” in his book “Democracy 
Incorporated” to describe our political system. It is a term that would 
make sense to Huxley. In inverted totalitarianism, the sophisticated 
technologies of corporate control, intimidation and mass manipulation, 
which far surpass those employed by previous totalitarian states, are 
effectively masked by the glitter, noise and abundance of a consumer 
society. Political participation and civil liberties are gradually 
surrendered. The corporation state, hiding behind the smokescreen of the
 public relations industry, the entertainment industry and the tawdry 
materialism of a consumer society, devours us from the inside out. It 
owes no allegiance to us or the nation. It feasts upon our carcass.  

The corporate state does not find its expression in a demagogue or 
charismatic leader. It is defined by the anonymity and facelessness of 
the corporation. Corporations, who hire attractive spokespeople like 
Barack Obama, control the uses of science, technology, education and 
mass communication. They control the messages in movies and television. 
And, as in “Brave New World,” they use these tools of communication to 
bolster tyranny. Our systems of mass communication, as Wolin writes, 
“block out, eliminate whatever might introduce qualification, ambiguity,
 or dialogue, anything that might weaken or complicate the holistic force of 
their creation, to its total impression.”

The result is a monochromatic system of 
information. Celebrity courtiers, masquerading as journalists, experts 
and specialists, identify our problems and patiently explain the 
parameters. All those who argue outside the imposed parameters are 
dismissed as irrelevant cranks, extremists or members of a radical left.
 Prescient social critics, from Ralph Nader to Noam Chomsky, are 
banished. Acceptable opinions have a range of A to B. The culture, under
 the tutelage of these corporate courtiers, becomes, as Huxley noted, a 
world of cheerful conformity, as well as an endless and finally fatal 
optimism. We busy ourselves buying products that promise to change our 
lives, make us more beautiful, confident or successful as we are 
steadily stripped of rights, money and influence. All messages we 
receive through these systems of communication, whether on the nightly 
news or talk shows like “Oprah,” promise a brighter, happier tomorrow. 
And this, as Wolin points out, is “the same ideology that invites 
corporate executives to exaggerate profits and conceal losses, but 
always with a sunny face.” We have been entranced, as Wolin writes, by 
“continuous technological advances” that “encourage elaborate fantasies 
of individual prowess, eternal youthfulness, beauty through surgery, 
actions measured in nanoseconds: a dream-laden culture of ever-expanding
 control and possibility, whose denizens are prone to fantasies because 
the vast majority have imagination but little scientific knowledge.” 

Our manufacturing base has been dismantled.
 Speculators and swindlers have looted the U.S. Treasury and stolen 
billions from small shareholders who had set aside money for retirement 
or college. Civil liberties, including habeas corpus and protection from
 warrantless wiretapping, have been taken away. Basic services, 
including public education and health care, have been handed over to the
 corporations to exploit for profit. The few who raise voices of 
dissent, who refuse to engage in the corporate happy talk, are derided 
by the corporate establishment as freaks. 

Attitudes and temperament have been 
cleverly engineered by the corporate state, as with Huxley’s pliant 
characters in “Brave New World.” The book’s protagonist, Bernard Marx, 
turns in frustration to his girlfriend Lenina:

“Don’t you wish you were free, Lenina?” he asks.

“I don’t know that you mean. I am free, free to have the most wonderful time. 
Everybody’s happy nowadays.”
He laughed, “Yes, ‘Everybody’s happy nowadays.’ We have been
 giving the children that at five. But wouldn’t you like to be free to 
be happy in some other way, Lenina? In your own way, for example; not in
 everybody else’s way.”

“I don’t know what you mean,” she repeated.

The façade is crumbling. And as more and 
more people realize that they have been used and robbed, we will move 
swiftly from Huxley’s “Brave New World” to Orwell’s “1984.” The public, 
at some point, will have to face some very unpleasant truths. The 
good-paying jobs are not coming back. The largest deficits in human 
history mean that we are trapped in a debt peonage system that will be 
used by the corporate state to eradicate the last vestiges of social 
protection for citizens, including Social Security. The state has 
devolved from a capitalist democracy to neo-feudalism. And when these 
truths become apparent, anger will replace the corporate-imposed 
cheerful conformity. The bleakness of our post-industrial pockets, where
 some 40 million Americans live in a state of poverty and tens of 
millions in a category called “near poverty,” coupled with the lack of 
credit to save families from foreclosures, bank repossessions and 
bankruptcy from medical bills, means that inverted totalitarianism will 
no longer work.

We increasingly live in Orwell’s Oceania, 
not Huxley’s The World State. Osama bin Laden plays the role assumed by 
Emmanuel Goldstein in “1984.” Goldstein, in the novel, is the public 
face of terror. His evil machinations and clandestine acts of violence 
dominate the nightly news. Goldstein’s image appears each day on 
Oceania’s television screens as part of the nation’s “Two Minutes of 
Hate” daily ritual. And without the intervention of the state, 
Goldstein, like bin Laden, will kill you. All excesses are justified in 
the titanic fight against evil personified. 

The psychological torture of Pvt. Bradley 
Manning—who has now been imprisoned for seven months without being 
convicted of any crime—mirrors the breaking of the dissident Winston 
Smith at the end of “1984.” Manning is being held as a “maximum custody 
detainee” in the brig at Marine Corps Base Quantico, in Virginia. He 
spends 23 of every 24 hours alone. He is denied exercise. He cannot have
 a pillow or sheets for his bed. Army doctors have been plying him with 
antidepressants. The cruder forms of torture of the Gestapo have been 
replaced with refined Orwellian techniques, largely developed by 
government psychologists, to turn dissidents like Manning into 
vegetables. We break souls as well as bodies. It is more effective. Now 
we can all be taken to Orwell’s dreaded Room 101 to become compliant and
 harmless. These “special administrative measures” are regularly imposed
 on our dissidents, including Syed Fahad Hashmi, who was imprisoned 
under similar conditions for three years before going to trial. The 
techniques have psychologically maimed thousands of detainees in our 
black sites around the globe. They are the staple form of control in our
 maximum security prisons where the corporate state makes war on our 
most politically astute underclass—African-Americans. It all presages 
the shift from Huxley to Orwell. 

“Never again will you be capable of 
ordinary human feeling,” Winston Smith’s torturer tells him in “1984.” 
“Everything will be dead inside you. Never again will you be capable of 
love, or friendship, or joy of living, or laughter, or curiosity, or 
courage, or integrity. You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty 
and then we shall fill you with ourselves.”

The noose is tightening. The era of 
amusement is being replaced by the era of repression. Tens of millions 
of citizens have had their e-mails and phone records turned over to the 
government. We are the most monitored and spied-on citizenry in human 
history. Many of us have our daily routine caught on dozens of security 
cameras. Our proclivities and habits are recorded on the Internet. Our 
profiles are electronically generated. Our bodies are patted down at 
airports and filmed by scanners. And public service announcements, car 
inspection stickers, and public transportation posters constantly urge 
us to report suspicious activity. The enemy is everywhere. 

Those who do not comply with the dictates 
of the war on terror, a war which, as Orwell noted, is endless, are 
brutally silenced. The draconian security measures used to cripple 
protests at the G-20 gatherings in Pittsburgh and Toronto were wildly 
disproportionate for the level of street activity. But they sent a clear
 message—DO NOT TRY THIS. The FBI’s targeting of antiwar and Palestinian
 activists, which in late September saw agents raid homes in Minneapolis
 and Chicago, is a harbinger of what is to come for all who dare defy 
the state’s official Newspeak. The agents—our Thought Police—seized 
phones, computers, documents and other personal belongings. Subpoenas to
 appear before a grand jury have since been served on 26 people. The 
subpoenas cite federal law prohibiting “providing material support or 
resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations.” Terror, even 
for those who have nothing to do with terror, becomes the blunt 
instrument used by Big Brother to protect us from ourselves.

“Do you begin to see, then, what kind of 
world we are creating?” Orwell wrote. “It is the exact opposite of the 
stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of 
fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled 
upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines 
itself.”

Chris Hedges is a senior fellow at The Nation Institute. His newest book is 
“Death of the Liberal Class.”
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/2011_a_brave_new_dystopia_20101227/





      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to