This wasnt a case of improvements. This was an emergency patching of a security hole. All WMF servers had to be updated and rebooted, the only noticeable reboots where in labs where there isnt redundancy/standby services that can be swapped into place to prevent down time.
This is not to say that our process went without issues. I will be drafting a postmortem from the user's perspective with several ideas and suggestions this weekend. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI: some of us in Analytics are talking about a "graduate labs" kind of > environment. Which would be more stable and treated a bit less > experimentally. It's not something we're going to push for yet, but I was > wondering how people here felt about it. It feels like our current labs > environment is improving at an amazing rate, but sometimes we might want to > prioritize stability over improvement. > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Harry Burt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Okay, gonna do something about my tools, they fall over every time this >> happens. >> >> Is it just a case of echo "webservice" > ".bigbrotherrc" ? Or does the >> daemon have to be enabled? >> >> Harry >> >> -- >> Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Labs-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Labs-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l > >
_______________________________________________ Labs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
