On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Gabriela Gibson <gabriela.gib...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> (snip (for brevity) ) >> > > >> > It can help to be flexible. >> >> I agree. Gabriela, I thought you had a nice detailed proposal, I wish >> you'd give it some time and just encourage folks to keep voting. >> >> It looks like Jan is on the path to fix the discrepancies in our >> voting that sebb highlighted some time ago - which will help long >> term... >> >> >> Thank you Tim and everyone, > > I'm still a bit unsure as to how to proceed. > > a) is it possible that the original vote process can be extended, given > that there was the confusion about the rules? If so, how long would you > recommend? > > b) if that is not possible, I would like ask for another vote to take > place, and because it's the Christmas season, ask if the voting period for > this attempt could be extended to the beginning of new year, ie, it would > end on 31st of December at 23:59. > > I am of course happy with any decision that is offered as an alternative > to the above.
Sorry again this is taking so long, I'd be fine either way, but reckon the safest approach at this point may be to just start a new vote with an extended period. Thanks, --tim --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: labs-unsubscr...@labs.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: labs-h...@labs.apache.org
