Thank you, Lorelei! Your explanations make a lot of sense, especially the bit 
about ending gimps crossed and cut-off.  In laces without gimps I couldn't see 
what any difference there'd be, but I still have a lot to learn.

You mention that the side the footside is on "goes with English or continental 
working methods"--it this true even for all the various point ground laces? 
that 
Bucks, Downton, etc. would all be worked with the the footside on the right, 
and 
even similar continental laces such as Tonder or Lille would be worked with the 
footside on the left? That English channel is a lot wider than it looks, isn't 
it!?!

Thanks again. I always appreciate the thoroughness of your answers!

Nancy



________________________________
From: Lorelei Halley <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, November 8, 2010 6:13:40 PM
Subject: [lace] right vs wrong sides

Nancy
I think you are right, that the only time a right and wrong side occurs in
straight laces is if there are tallies lying on top of a cloth stitch or half
stitch section.  I suppose it is possible to have a right and wrong side with
....

It occurs to me that there might be another reason for a wrong side in
straight lace.  If you have gimp outlining parts of a floral design, the
motifs will end periodically and the gimps will be crossed underneath the
motif and cut off (to be restarted at the top of the next repeat).  You would
want those cut crossed gimps not to be too visible on the right side.
Therefore in this situation the side which faces you as you work would be the
wrong side, because that is where the crossed gimps are cut.  From the other
side the crossed cut gimps would not be so visible.  But it wouldn't matter
which side the foot is on.  It would be the crossed cut gimps.  The foot goes
with English or continental working methods and is not the important factor
here.

Lorelei Halley

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]

Reply via email to