On 30/04/14 19:10, Roland Gruber wrote:
Hi Rowland,

On 30.04.2014 17:30, Rowland Penny wrote:
Hi, if you are using lam with samba4 to manage windows & unix users and
groups, do you have to have the posixAccount & posixGroup objectClasses
in AD ?
AD/Samba 4 provides both object classes. So you can use them out-of-the-box.
There are small differences regarding e.g. OpenLDAP like homeDirectory
is unixHomeDirectory in AD.

Use these account modules for Unix on AD:

Users: Unix (posixAccount)
Groups: Unix (windowsPosixGroup)


OK, I thought you might say that, so how do I raise a bug report on lam ?

Reason:

If you have a Samba 4 AD server (or a windows AD server) and only add users & groups with ADUC, you will NEVER get the posixAccount or posixGroup objectClasses, the only way to get these objectclasses is by either the samba classicupgrade or with samba-tool, neither of which really should happen because the posix objectClasses are auxiliaries of other objectClasses (user, group).

Rowland



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs


_______________________________________________
Lam-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Lam-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public

Reply via email to