As I said before, I have rights to speak, and you can ignore whatever
you don't like, I'm nothing to affect your decision, but ovisily this
shows that much my information are important that makes a langcom member
think more.
On 5/9/2015 12:13 AM, Oliver Stegen wrote:
Asaf had written on 07-May-15 3:48 AM (GMT+3):
"Mjbmr: I think you've shared valuable information here, but you do
need to exercise more patience with the process. LangCom deals with
complex decisions that are relatively high-stakes, in the sense that
once things are set in motion they are quite difficult and perhaps
impossible to undo/reverse. So deliberation and patience are the
natural modes for it."
I concur with his advice. So please be patient and let LangCom do
their job. We appreciate your input on the relevant language
background. However, any additional messages now detract from the time
and energy which LangCom members have available for dealing with the
complex decisions we are mandated to make (and this detraction
actually includes me writing this message).
Sincerely,
Oliver
On 08-May-15 8:12 PM, Mjbmr wrote:
Can you be more specific please?
On 5/8/2015 7:04 PM, Oliver Stegen wrote:
Dear Mjbmr,
Please take Asaf's advice to you in a message of early May 7 (or
late May 6) to heart and refrain from comments which are inciting.
As it is, you are actually making an agreement between voting
LangCom members more difficult with such messages. Thanks for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
Oliver
On 08-May-15 10:58 AM, Mjbmr wrote:
Any language member can veto such a highly decision, but if he
doesn't do anything and wasting the time, other langcom member
better decide. btw, that's why iso639-3 is for, there is no need to
discuss this with az project to see if they will allow creation of
azb project.
On 5/8/2015 11:42 AM, Oliver Stegen wrote:
Gerard,
I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some
issues seem to be impossible to discuss by email.
Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's try
again by this imperfect medium riddled with potential
misunderstandings ... *sigh*
How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I
understand that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate
with each other in writing. The recent crisis has shown that the
az community is deeply divided. For most LangCom members that
seems to be enough evidence to split az wikipedia in two. LangCom
has the mandate to make such decisions. Please make a constructive
proposal asap so that LangCom will not be accused again to delay
urgent matters. Thanks.
Oliver
On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on it. So I
am dead against without clarification what the az wikipedia
wants. Not having this feedback I reserve judgement until a later
date.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 May 2015 at 22:08, Michael Everson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 7 May 2015, at 10:05, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one
affects another. There obvious parallels and I do not want
this to be an excuse.
Answer my questions.
Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what form?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
