Gerard,
Please concentrate on interacting with voting LangCom members more than
on replying to unhelpful accusations by observers.
Both Michael and I have asked you to make concrete suggestions about how
you want LangCom to move forward and avoid the current impasse caused by
your veto.
Looking forward to your *concrete* suggestions,
Oliver
On 08-May-15 12:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
Who says that I am doing anything and what do you base it on that I am
wasting time?
You are wrong and I have my reasons.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 May 2015 at 09:58, Mjbmr <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Any language member can veto such a highly decision, but if he
doesn't do anything and wasting the time, other langcom member
better decide. btw, that's why iso639-3 is for, there is no need
to discuss this with az project to see if they will allow creation
of azb project.
On 5/8/2015 11:42 AM, Oliver Stegen wrote:
Gerard,
I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some
issues seem to be impossible to discuss by email.
Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's
try again by this imperfect medium riddled with potential
misunderstandings ... *sigh*
How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I
understand that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate
with each other in writing. The recent crisis has shown that the
az community is deeply divided. For most LangCom members that
seems to be enough evidence to split az wikipedia in two. LangCom
has the mandate to make such decisions. Please make a
constructive proposal asap so that LangCom will not be accused
again to delay urgent matters. Thanks.
Oliver
On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on it. So I
am dead against without clarification what the az wikipedia
wants. Not having this feedback I reserve judgement until a
later date.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 May 2015 at 22:08, Michael Everson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 7 May 2015, at 10:05, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one
affects another. There obvious parallels and I do not want
this to be an excuse.
Answer my questions.
Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what
form?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
