Gerard,
I really see the need of LangCom face-to-face meetings as some issues
seem to be impossible to discuss by email.
Anyway, in the face of not being able to meet in person, let's try again
by this imperfect medium riddled with potential misunderstandings ... *sigh*
How do you propose to receive feedback from az wikipedia? I understand
that az wikipedia members are not able to communicate with each other in
writing. The recent crisis has shown that the az community is deeply
divided. For most LangCom members that seems to be enough evidence to
split az wikipedia in two. LangCom has the mandate to make such
decisions. Please make a constructive proposal asap so that LangCom will
not be accused again to delay urgent matters. Thanks.
Oliver
On 08-May-15 8:08 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
A blanket statements means that I do not put a date on it. So I am
dead against without clarification what the az wikipedia wants. Not
having this feedback I reserve judgement until a later date.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 May 2015 at 22:08, Michael Everson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 7 May 2015, at 10:05, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Maybe but there are discussions in parallel and this one affects
another. There obvious parallels and I do not want this to be an
excuse.
Answer my questions.
Where exactly do you expect feedback? By what date? In what form?
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
