On 25 Aug 2015, at 18:34, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Linguistically it is the same language. There is no reason why it needs to be > a different code. The standard allows for a code that is different. The code > en-simple is not in conformance with the standard.
Please explain what exactly you mean. “The standard (which?) allows for a code that is different (from what?)”. How is “en-simple” not in conformance with “the standard” (which?)? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
