I thought the issue was a community which would take care of a project.

So, even if a revitalized language has a community *outside* of Wikimedia, that doesn't automatically mean that an application for a wiki project would be granted. So, fair enough, we can accept the application for such a language as eligible, but the promoter of the *wiki* project still has to give evidence of the wiki project being sustainable. Otherwise, we'll be swamped with orphaned projects.

Fwiw,
Oliver

On 27-Jan-16 3:50 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
I replied there.

I don't think that there should be a hard blocker for this. A language that is reasonably used outside of Wikimedia for publishing or education world is definitely eligible in my book.

Projects like the Tunisian Latin alphabet, which we discussed here a few months ago, is borderline, because it looks like a hobbyist project with little actual use, and I'd need something more substantial. But if, for example, a real school is involved, then I wouldn't block such things.


--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

2016-01-27 13:08 GMT+02:00 gfb hjjhjh <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

    ​​
    The thing is that if someone want to initiate a new project but
    believed they does not met the written criteria, then they might
    simply opt to not proceed with their application at all. If there
    are no application then there are no round corner for langcom to
    blend.

    2016-01-27 16:12 GMT+08:00 Gerard Meijssen
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

        Hoi,
        The language committee has always had the ability to do as it
        sees fit. All it takes is consent from all members. There is
        not much need to change the rules because there is an inherent
        ability to bend the rules.
        Thanks,
              GerardM

        On 27 January 2016 at 00:06, MF-Warburg
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        wrote:

            Please see the discussion at
            
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Language_proposal_policy.27s_Requisites_for_eligibility>.


            _______________________________________________
            Langcom mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



        _______________________________________________
        Langcom mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom



    _______________________________________________
    Langcom mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom




_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to