Yes, this is certain. בתאריך 27 בינו׳ 2016 20:44, "Oliver Stegen" <[email protected]> כתב:
> I thought the issue was a community which would take care of a project. > > So, even if a revitalized language has a community *outside* of Wikimedia, > that doesn't automatically mean that an application for a wiki project > would be granted. So, fair enough, we can accept the application for such a > language as eligible, but the promoter of the *wiki* project still has to > give evidence of the wiki project being sustainable. Otherwise, we'll be > swamped with orphaned projects. > > Fwiw, > Oliver > > On 27-Jan-16 3:50 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote: > > I replied there. > > I don't think that there should be a hard blocker for this. A language > that is reasonably used outside of Wikimedia for publishing or education > world is definitely eligible in my book. > > Projects like the Tunisian Latin alphabet, which we discussed here a few > months ago, is borderline, because it looks like a hobbyist project with > little actual use, and I'd need something more substantial. But if, for > example, a real school is involved, then I wouldn't block such things. > > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > > 2016-01-27 13:08 GMT+02:00 gfb hjjhjh <[email protected]>: > >> >> The thing is that if someone want to initiate a new project but believed >> they does not met the written criteria, then they might simply opt to not >> proceed with their application at all. If there are no application then >> there are no round corner for langcom to blend. >> >> 2016-01-27 16:12 GMT+08:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hoi, >>> The language committee has always had the ability to do as it sees fit. >>> All it takes is consent from all members. There is not much need to change >>> the rules because there is an inherent ability to bend the rules. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 27 January 2016 at 00:06, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please see the discussion at < >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Language_proposal_policy.27s_Requisites_for_eligibility>. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
