At one point LangCom had said that a language which has successfully
applied for one project can have any following ones without problems
(provided there is a community for it which takes care of it). And of
course, we do have a Simple English wikipedia. However, in this
particular case, I don't think that the "second projects granted" rule
should apply as the very existence of simple:wp is an exception in the
first place.
So, I vote for rejection on this.
Oliver
On 06-Feb-16 12:08 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
I totally agree.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 February 2016 at 16:59, MF-Warburg <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There is a proposal at
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Simple_English>
IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can
easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no
ISO code).
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
