I am well aware of the recent discussion here about a "subtag" for Simple English (at which, however, something like "en-x-wpsimple" was mentioned, not en-simple). However, that doesn't mean it now has an ISO 639-1 or -3 code as our policy requires and that also doesn't prejudice Langcom's decision on the eligibility.
2016-02-06 16:42 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > Hoi, > That is just a matter of asking for inclusion in the standard. Michael is > well placed to do so. > Thanks, > Gerard > > On 6 February 2016 at 16:39, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Who decided that? >> >> >> 2016-02-06 16:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Everson <[email protected]>: >> >>> en-simple.wikipedia.org is now permitted. >>> >>> > On 5 Feb 2016, at 15:59, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > There is a proposal at < >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Simple_English >>> > >>> > >>> > IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can >>> easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no ISO code). >>> >>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
