Yes, without a doubt. I did not intend to say anything about suddenly disallowing simple *Wikipedia*. Am 06.02.2016 20:34 schrieb "Oliver Stegen" <[email protected]>:
> MF: the Simple English wikipedia was approved long before we had > regulations about ISO codes and suchlike (cf. > http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaSIMPLE.htm), and we do not > usually "uncharter" active wikis, even if they wouldn't pass our current > requirements (I understand that there are a number of European dialects > with wiki projects which do not have an ISO code of their own). > > However, while our regulations stipulate that subsequent wiki projects are > easily granted for languages which already have an active project, I see > the need, as I have written, to not allow that for languages without ISO > code. So: Simple English *wikipedia* can continue but we shouldn't allow > other projects (like the requested wikiversity) for Simple English. > > Is that consensus-able? (badly translated from German "konsensfähig") > > On 06-Feb-16 6:46 PM, MF-Warburg wrote: > > I am well aware of the recent discussion here about a "subtag" for Simple > English (at which, however, something like "en-x-wpsimple" was mentioned, > not en-simple). > However, that doesn't mean it now has an ISO 639-1 or -3 code as our > policy requires and that also doesn't prejudice Langcom's decision on the > eligibility. > > 2016-02-06 16:42 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > >> Hoi, >> That is just a matter of asking for inclusion in the standard. Michael is >> well placed to do so. >> Thanks, >> Gerard >> >> On 6 February 2016 at 16:39, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Who decided that? >>> >>> >>> 2016-02-06 16:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Everson <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> en-simple.wikipedia.org is now permitted. >>>> >>>> > On 5 Feb 2016, at 15:59, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > There is a proposal at < >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Simple_English >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > IMHO, this needs to be rejected, as "Simple English courses" can >>>> easily be hosted on en.wikiversity (also, there is of course no ISO code). >>>> >>>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
