If we're talking about Patois (ISO code jam), then it's definitely a
valid language. I vote for accepting it.
Looking at the analysis of its wikipedia pages on the incubator [1], the
last three months have seen 3+ editors with tons of activity. The most
used core messages have all been translated. [2]
I'm contacting a good friend of mine whose mother is a Patois speaker,
just to see whether he can recommend a scholar for verifying content
being actually written in Patois.
So, I hope that jam.wikipedia.org - which currently still gives an error
message - will be a reality soon!
Best,
Oliver
[1]
https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/jam&wiki=incubatorwiki
[2] https://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=jam
On 20-Apr-16 10:59 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
So we can at least move forward and accept it as a valid language? How
about moving on from that??
Thanks,
GerardM
On 18 April 2016 at 15:51, Michael Everson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I’ve published Alice in it. :-)
> On 17 Apr 2016, at 08:30, Gerard Meijssen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Hoi,
> I have been told that the Jamaican languages is doing rather
well. What is its status?
> Thanks,
> GerardM
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
