No offense to you, _Michael_, but how familiar are you with the Jamaican
language?
_Amir_: Expert confirmation includes more for me than just confirming
that it's the same orthography. We also want to verify that the
wikipedia makes proper use of the target language in general (grammar,
lexis, naturalness of discourse structure and suchlike).
As I had written on 21 April:
Looking at the analysis of its wikipedia pages on the incubator [1],
the last three months have seen 3+ editors with tons of activity.
The most used core messages have all been translated. [2]
I'm contacting a good friend of mine whose mother is a Patois
speaker, just to see whether he can recommend a scholar for
verifying content being actually written in Patois.
So, I hope that jam.wikipedia.org - which currently still gives an
error message - will be a reality soon!
[...]
[1]
https://tools.wmflabs.org/meta/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0&title=Wp/jam&wiki=incubatorwiki
[2] https://tools.wmflabs.org/robin/?tool=codelookup&code=jam
While my friend hasn't responded yet, I've been contacted by Marcos
Williamson with the following advice:
I would recommend contacting someone from the Jamaican Language Unit
at the University of the West Indies http://www.mona.uwi.edu/dllp/jlu/
Could _one of my LangCom colleagues_ please look into that? Thanks.
Oliver
On 25-Apr-16 2:25 PM, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
If we can count Michael's comment about the orthography as an expert
confirmation, then let's approve it.
If not, we need to find another expert.
I'd be liberal and say Yes, let's approve.
--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
2016-04-25 14:09 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
Hoi,
The question is not only if it is eligible ... we agree that it
is. The question is what needs to be done to reach the final stage.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 21 April 2016 at 20:12, Antony Green <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I agree, it's eligible.
Am 2016-04-21 um 15:13 schrieb Michael Everson:
On 21 Apr 2016, at 05:15, Oliver Stegen
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If we're talking about Patois (ISO code jam), then
it's definitely a valid language. I vote for accepting it.
I’ve looked at it and it’s just the same orthography I’ve
published in http://www.evertype.com/books/alice-jam.html
This is definitely good to go.
Michael Everson
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31
WE 1703
10369 Berlin
E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Mobile: +49-176-82295920 <tel:%2B49-176-82295920>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
