If we can count Michael's comment about the orthography as an expert confirmation, then let's approve it.
If not, we need to find another expert. I'd be liberal and say Yes, let's approve. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore 2016-04-25 14:09 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > Hoi, > The question is not only if it is eligible ... we agree that it is. The > question is what needs to be done to reach the final stage. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 21 April 2016 at 20:12, Antony Green <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree, it's eligible. >> >> >> Am 2016-04-21 um 15:13 schrieb Michael Everson: >> >>> On 21 Apr 2016, at 05:15, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> If we're talking about Patois (ISO code jam), then it's definitely a >>>> valid language. I vote for accepting it. >>>> >>> I’ve looked at it and it’s just the same orthography I’ve published in >>> http://www.evertype.com/books/alice-jam.html >>> >>> This is definitely good to go. >>> >>> Michael Everson >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >> >> -- >> Dr. Antony Green >> Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 >> WE 1703 >> 10369 Berlin >> E-Mail: [email protected] >> Mobile: +49-176-82295920 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
