<GRRRRR>

On 17 May 2017 at 21:05, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On 17 May 2017, at 17:13, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Because SIL is at least sensible enough to have the policy to change
> derogatory codes, while Congress Library is too white to be able to
> comprehend that.
> >
> > You do not have any idea what you are talking about.
>
> Obviously. However, at least they understand that there are offensive
> language names [1]. Although, thanks for the information, they are
> also too white, as well, to recognize that there is a need to change
> the code if it's been based on offensive name.
>
> > Melanin helps to protect us from UV radiation and to permit the
> production of Vitamin D.
> >
> > I have explained to you MANY TIMES. Most of the ISO 639-2 codes were
> made many years ago. No one was trying to insult anyone. No one was trying
> to push an imperialist agenda. No one was looking at skin tone variation in
> Chile. They were trying to tag data for libraries. Do you understand this?
> >
> > I have explained to you MANY TIMES as well that reluctance to change
> codes on the part of the JAC has to do with a concern for stability in
> encoding.
> >
> > I ave informed you that I have spoken to the JAC, and I have supplied to
> you their response. They looked at this 5 years ago and were not minded at
> that time to destabilize encoding. They also said they would consider an
> application if one were submitted.
> >
> > You persist in arguing with ME about it and all I have done is explain
> facts to you.
>
> You are still embarrassing yourself. Nobody told here that there are
> bad intentions. (Just to remind you, Cold War ended ~30 years ago :P )
> I told you that you are perpetuating institutional racism [, filled
> with absolutely good intentions].
>
> If you want to understand what I am talking about, please start with
> this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism
>
> [1] http://archive.ethnologue.com/16/ethno_docs/introduction.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to