On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote: > The correct terms to use are “endonym” and “exonym”. You maintain that at > least some Mapuche dislike an exonym so much that they refuse to use a > Wikipedia prefixed with “arn”. They live in Chile, right? In a region called > Araucanía. They may call it something else in their language, but it would > appear that this term would be widespread and visible everywhere.
Do we want to talk about Mapudungun issue and do the best to fix their problem or we want to continue the general discussion? > Miloš Rančić, I hereby request an immediate formal apology from you right > now, here, in public, for having attacked the Unicode Consortium as > perpetrating “institutional racism”. The Unicode Consortium, along with > ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2, maintains the Universal Character Set, known as the Unicode > Standard and ISO/IEC 10646. This standard has nothing whatever to do with the > language codes of ISO 639. Willing to do that if I see constructive approach in the case of Mapudungun. _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
