On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 18 May 2017, at 12:56, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Michael Everson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> The correct terms to use are “endonym” and “exonym”. You maintain that at >>> least some Mapuche dislike an exonym so much that they refuse to use a >>> Wikipedia prefixed with “arn”. They live in Chile, right? In a region >>> called Araucanía. They may call it something else in their language, but it >>> would appear that this term would be widespread and visible everywhere. >> >> Do we want to talk about Mapudungun issue and do the best to fix their >> problem or we want to continue the general discussion? > > I have ALREADY TOLD YOU what can be done. I told you and the Chilean > representative in Berlin. I told you just yesterday. I wrote to the JAC > mentioning the pronblem. They responded. I forward their response here. There > isn’t anything else LangCom can do about it. > > If Chileans wish to petition the ISO 639 JAC again about this matter, the JAC > will consider it. > > I do not believe that LangCom or WMF should sponsor such a petition. > >>> Miloš Rančić, I hereby request an immediate formal apology from you right >>> now, here, in public, for having attacked the Unicode Consortium as >>> perpetrating “institutional racism”. The Unicode Consortium, along with >>> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2, maintains the Universal Character Set, known as the >>> Unicode Standard and ISO/IEC 10646. This standard has nothing whatever to >>> do with the language codes of ISO 639. >> >> Willing to do that if I see constructive approach in the case of Mapudungun. > > You should do it out of shame.
So, we are stuck. _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
