On 11 Dec 2017, at 14:42, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Oliver, I do not agree with your proposal and it's already doomed, as our > present system for making decisions is strict consensus.
I do agree with Oliver’s proposal, and consensus (which is not the same as unanimity) would be achieved in the absence of the person who persisted in flaming after being reprimanded. That person would have a vote again after re-instatement. Michael _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
