In response to MichaeL:

>> I. The language itself

>> The proponents of the project have convinced me that Montenegrin is 
>> comparable as a language standard to Serbian, Croatian or Bosnian.

>How have they convinced you? Where are the pages of paradigms?

Understand what they have and have not convinced me. They have convinced me 
that Montenegrin is as entitled to be called a language as Serbian or 
Croatian—no more, and no less.  You have frequently gone back and compared this 
situation to the very fine work you did on Western Armenian, but I don't think 
it's at all comparable. In this case, I am merely saying that Montenegrin is 
one of the four language standards within the macrolanguage Serbo-Croatian. So: 
If you were asked, today—leaving aside history—whether an independent Serbian 
Wikipedia would be eligible under current rules, what would you say? If you 
would say no, then we're pretty much in the same position. If you would say 
yes, then I'd like to know why Serbian qualifies, but Montenegrin doesn't.

>> Conclusion
>> Several people have said to me that Montenegrin is more similar to other 
>> Serbo-Croatian varieties than US and UK English are to each other; would I 
>> insist on separate projects if they happened to have separate language 
>> codes? No, I wouldn't. But that's because on the whole, the various 
>> English-speaking communities around the world do manage to co-exist with 
>> each other quite well—and tend to blunt each other's excesses a bit, too. 
>> Sadly, that's not the case here.

>So you want us to enable their divisions?

In an ideal world, I would prefer not to. But the divisions already exist and 
the history already exists, both in the world at large and within our WMF 
microcosm. If you have a way to wipe out these divisions and have everyone work 
together in harmony on a single Serbo-Croatian project, then please tell me how 
to do that. I'm saying very clearly: I do not think it is possible. (Do you 
think the Montenegrins are upset now? Try to close the other three projects and 
merge them into Serbo-Croatian. Then you'll really hear screaming.) Maybe none 
of the four projects (Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Montenegrin) should really 
exist as independent projects. But three do, and we are not going to delete 
them. And if those three do, the fourth must also; it's no less deserving than 
the others.




Subject: Digest Footer

Langcom mailing list


End of Langcom Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5

Sent from Outlook<>
Langcom mailing list

Reply via email to