We can lock and leave the "content" there and inform people that if they wish to contribute further they can start a test project on the Incubator if that's okay.
2018-03-21 15:33 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: > Hoi, > Having a project locked is different from having it moved to Incubator.. I > do not object to the project being locked. > Thanks, > Gerard > > On 21 March 2018 at 14:39, MarcoAurelio <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Issue is that we're serving a project for just 15 pages. I'd argue that >> is, indeed, absence of content since the wiki creation. Combined with no >> users interested in the project, etc., the best we can do, IMHO, is to lock >> the project and return it back to Incubator. Respectfully submitted, MA. >> >> 2018-03-20 7:38 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hoi, >>> As there is nothing new, no change in the maintenance needed for this >>> particular project I see his point but I do not see the need. >>> Thanks, >>> GerardM >>> >>> On 19 March 2018 at 23:54, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Please see Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Malagasy Wikibooks >>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Malagasy_Wikibooks> >>>> on >>>> Meta. >>>> >>>> >>>> The general argument here is that this project has been dormant for >>>> about ten years, and should be closed. There is not a vandalism problem on >>>> the project, and indeed I argued that LangCom's current position is that it >>>> is better to leave dormant projects alone than to close them and move them >>>> to Incubator. >>>> >>>> >>>> User:MarcoAurelio, a steward who has posted here occasionally, argues >>>> that it's one more dormant project for stewards and global sysops to watch, >>>> and that in his view, it would be better to close this project. Two people >>>> in the community have responded: one user who really the only material >>>> contributor in the last ten years, along with an active sysop from Malagasy >>>> Wikipedia. Both effectively take the position that they're OK either way. >>>> >>>> >>>> I would personally argue against closing, because I don't see this as >>>> being a special case, and I'm concerned that it would open the doors to >>>> many more requests to close small projects. But I'd like to hear some >>>> other opinions about this. >>>> >>>> >>>> Steven >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Langcom mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
