Hello, Actually the policy allows closing projects "which don't have content or existing content is insignificant" (type one). In this case, mgwikibooks falls under that clause totally in my opinion:
- only one editor has been somewhat active there for 10 years and has not really objected to the closure, - existing content is insignificant; there's not even a single finished book and most content is of the type of < https://mg.wikibooks.org/wiki/Jeografia>, if anything, only the Python book may need to be transferred to the Incubator (~10 short pages). - and community seems to be supportive to the idea of closing the project due to its lack of content and inactivity. Given all of the above, I invite the LangCom to vote for closing the project. Thanks, MA. El El mié, 21 mar 2018 a las 21:20, Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com> escribió: > That is only appropriate if the current content is actually junk. If it's > legitimate, either it gets transferred or the original project stays open. > > MA, current policy is not to close projects unless they are infested with > spam. I am quite worried that if we close this we will end up closing many > others. That might well make the lives of stewards and GS a little easier, > but it mostly runs against the grain of WMF's mission. > > Steven White >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
