Hoi,
When it is about a Wikibooks, I do not need a period in the Incubator. As
far as I am concerned, they can just move forward.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 21 March 2018 at 16:28, MarcoAurelio <[email protected]> wrote:
> We can lock and leave the "content" there and inform people that if they
> wish to contribute further they can start a test project on the Incubator
> if that's okay.
>
> 2018-03-21 15:33 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hoi,
>> Having a project locked is different from having it moved to Incubator..
>> I do not object to the project being locked.
>> Thanks,
>> Gerard
>>
>> On 21 March 2018 at 14:39, MarcoAurelio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Issue is that we're serving a project for just 15 pages. I'd argue that
>>> is, indeed, absence of content since the wiki creation. Combined with no
>>> users interested in the project, etc., the best we can do, IMHO, is to lock
>>> the project and return it back to Incubator. Respectfully submitted, MA.
>>>
>>> 2018-03-20 7:38 GMT+01:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> Hoi,
>>>> As there is nothing new, no change in the maintenance needed for this
>>>> particular project I see his point but I do not see the need.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> GerardM
>>>>
>>>> On 19 March 2018 at 23:54, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please see Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Malagasy
>>>>> Wikibooks
>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Malagasy_Wikibooks>
>>>>> on
>>>>> Meta.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The general argument here is that this project has been dormant for
>>>>> about ten years, and should be closed. There is not a vandalism problem on
>>>>> the project, and indeed I argued that LangCom's current position is that
>>>>> it
>>>>> is better to leave dormant projects alone than to close them and move them
>>>>> to Incubator.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> User:MarcoAurelio, a steward who has posted here occasionally, argues
>>>>> that it's one more dormant project for stewards and global sysops to
>>>>> watch,
>>>>> and that in his view, it would be better to close this project. Two people
>>>>> in the community have responded: one user who really the only material
>>>>> contributor in the last ten years, along with an active sysop from
>>>>> Malagasy
>>>>> Wikipedia. Both effectively take the position that they're OK either way.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would personally argue against closing, because I don't see this as
>>>>> being a special case, and I'm concerned that it would open the doors to
>>>>> many more requests to close small projects. But I'd like to hear some
>>>>> other opinions about this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Steven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Langcom mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Langcom mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
