When people ask for the development of UNICODE definitions and associated
fonts, there is no such thing as "resolved" when there is a need for them.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:18, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON <
> [email protected]>:
>
>> Hi y'all,
>>
>> Sure, done: I made a comment on
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Javanese#General_discussion
>>
>> That said, I would like to know where the members of the Language
>> Committee stand on this matter.
>> Should it be only an advice/comment and should it be more enforced? (I
>> know the Wikisource Community itself is on the fence and most don't have a
>> strong opinion either way).
>>
>
> Thanks! I have to admit I'm not aware of the Wikisource community
> discussions on this matter. Would there be a good way of enforcing the use
> of the extension anyway? I'd think it's best to make it as easy as possible
> to use -- surely the practicality of the extension itself is already the
> best advertisement for it?
>
> @ Gerard:
> is your comment about the comment on the wiki page from 2008? I think that
> issue was already solved.
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
