Yes, that's why by "resolved" I obviously mean they seem to exist now.
Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 19:53 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen < [email protected]>: > When people ask for the development of UNICODE definitions and associated > fonts, there is no such thing as "resolved" when there is a need for them. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:18, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON < >> [email protected]>: >> >>> Hi y'all, >>> >>> Sure, done: I made a comment on >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Javanese#General_discussion >>> >>> That said, I would like to know where the members of the Language >>> Committee stand on this matter. >>> Should it be only an advice/comment and should it be more enforced? (I >>> know the Wikisource Community itself is on the fence and most don't have a >>> strong opinion either way). >>> >> >> Thanks! I have to admit I'm not aware of the Wikisource community >> discussions on this matter. Would there be a good way of enforcing the use >> of the extension anyway? I'd think it's best to make it as easy as possible >> to use -- surely the practicality of the extension itself is already the >> best advertisement for it? >> >> @ Gerard: >> is your comment about the comment on the wiki page from 2008? I think >> that issue was already solved. >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
