I think LzDataset uses it. We'd have to deprecate it first.
A
On May 31, P T Withington wrote:
> And, do we even need LzParam?
>
> lzx> foo = {'a': 'a', 'A': 'A'}
> «Object#67| {a: a, A: A}»
> lzx> Debug.inspect({a: a, A: A})
> {a: a, A: A} {
> a: a
> A: A
> }«Object#67| {a: a, A: A}»
> lzx>
>
> Or is it obsolete?
>
> On 2006-05-31, at 12:07 EDT, P T Withington wrote:
>
> > [From LzParam]
> >
> > //undefine all setters but name and id
> > LzParam.prototype.setters.$hasdefaultattrs = -1;
> >
> > //
> > ========================================================================
> > ======
> > // @keywords private
> > //
> > ========================================================================
> > ======
> > LzParam.prototype.construct = function ( parent , args ){
> > super.construct( parent, args );
> > var mysetters ={};
> > mysetters.__proto__ = this.setters;
> > this.setters = mysetters;
> > // construct
> > this.d = {};
> > }
> >
> > The construct method is creating a shadow setters table for every
> > instance of LzParam. Is this really necessary?
> > _______________________________________________
> > Laszlo-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
> _______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
