absolutely
On May 31, P T Withington wrote:
> So if we invert things and have a dictionary as the base class, you could use
> that instead?
>
> On 2006-05-31, at 14:02 EDT, Adam Wolff wrote:
>
> > LzParam was supposed to be a LzNode that could function as a dictionary.
> > Probably an override of setAttribute would be more appropriate, but the
> > compiler inlines some of those calls.
> >
> > A
> >
> > On May 31, P T Withington wrote:
> >
> > > [From LzParam]
> > >
> > > //undefine all setters but name and id
> > > LzParam.prototype.setters.$hasdefaultattrs = -1;
> > >
> > > //==============================================================================
> > > // @keywords private
> > > //==============================================================================
> > > LzParam.prototype.construct = function ( parent , args ){
> > > super.construct( parent, args );
> > > var mysetters ={};
> > > mysetters.__proto__ = this.setters;
> > > this.setters = mysetters;
> > > // construct
> > > this.d = {};
> > > }
> > >
> > > The construct method is creating a shadow setters table for every instance
> > > of
> > > LzParam. Is this really necessary?
>
_______________________________________________
Laszlo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openlaszlo.org/mailman/listinfo/laszlo-dev
