Luckily, Spket IDE has just released. It has not visual design tool, but it is good to work both stand alone IDE and Eclipse plugin. You can select it on your environment. I have tried it just now, it works fine. If i can say more, it was good to have more components on the snippets. :p
mt1 Cortlandt Winters wrote: > HI Andy, > > I'd like to know. Are you more in need of layout, image design, or > animation design? > > I'm asking because I have a lot of ideas for the three and have a > theory that layout and animation design would be folk's top > priorities, in that sequence, with image design a lesser priority, as > individual images would probably still be authored in swf or png or > gif and that the top two use cases would be 1) layout/binding and 2) > animation. > > Does that fit with what you are thinking? > > -Cort > > On 4/3/07, Andrew Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > I don't know about anyone else but we've been using OpenLaszlo for > 18 months and we are now in the process of moving away from it to > plain ajax/jsf infrastructure. The reason given by management is > the lack of visual design tools. The opinion (and I have to agree) > is that it takes too long to train the new engineers on the > specifics of laszlo design / layout on top of everything else they > have to learn about our product. Too many of the other tools out > there are allowing you to visually tweak the layout and look and > feel of UI and laszlo is unfortunately behind the times with > regard to this functionality. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of mt1 > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 7:12 AM > To: laszlo-user > Subject: Re: [Laszlo-user] IDE4Laszlo status > > David, > > I know what your opinion on the IDE of OpenLaszlo. > Yes, i agree with you about what you said there are a lot of good > XML editors and OpenLaszlo > programers can use them. > Until a few month ago, i also used Eclipse with IDE4Laszlo. > But now, i am using simple text editor to edit coding, and i am > satisfied with using it. > It was too heavy for my PC that was working Eclipse, Tomcat with > LPS and PostgresSQL for database. > > But in the other hand, many engineers are using Eclipse. > I fond a result of using IDE research by Nikkei-BP in Japan, as > following. > > http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20070329/266887/ > <http://itpro.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/OPINION/20070329/266887/> > > Unfortunately it described with Japanese, but i say simply, Visual > studio is the most used and > Eclipse is the second. From this research, we don't look out the > Eclipse environment. > > We should mention who are use the IDE. > You know OpenLaszlo provided IDE for Eclipse at the first, but in > Flex, the first was the FlexBuilder, > the second was for Eclipse. I think we should give attention the > IDE for whom. > If we have image for *power* engineers, we don't any take care > about IDE, because they can find some > good programing tool which they like. > If we have image for *ordinary* engineers, we might to provide for > Eclipse environment. Because most > of the engineers are in a IT department in their company and they > can hardly to choice their > *environment* for their development. The reason why, the one is > the issue of standardization and the another is the > *custom* for their coding style, and there are many more, i guess. > Just i can say, there are > many barrier to introduce some *new developing tool* into their > corporate department. But if it is based on > Eclipse, it can easy to introduce into it. Because they already > *have* and *know* it. > But if we have image for *beginner* engineer, that mean who is a > web designer or a novice programer, > the visual design tool will be big present for them. > I know you are almost thinking about those. > > Back to your opinion, the visual tool is great efficient tool. But > it should have relation with the text coding tool > or it ought to include it. Because it must occur with bit control > on the editor, like x/y position control or some > attribute and more. > I can say it dose not work on Eclipse, but Eclipse plugin have a > advantage compare with it. > It mean not *tool* but *strategy*. > OpenLaslzo and Webtop are very cool, but most of engineers > requires a development tool too. > I have no doubt it is very important point to generalize OpenLaszlo. > > So my opinion, it is glad for them to get two coding tool. The one > is the *special* design tool( like FlexBuilder ) > and the other is the plugin for Eclipse. :-) > > mt1 > > > jamesr wrote: > >> >> On Mar 24, 2007, at 12:16 PM, David Temkin wrote: >> >>> mt1, >>> >>> IDE4Laszlo -- we (Laszlo Systems) haven't done anything with it >>> and don't plan to. Doesn't mean someone else can't do something >>> with it. >>> >>> One idea that we're discussing now is to kick off a project to >>> make an LZX-based graphical editor. It's scope would be limited >>> to the graphical layout, positioning, linkage, attributes, etc >>> of LZX objects. It would not be code editing-focused -- there >>> are tons of tools for that. It would be written in LZX, and >>> would run in the browser. It would support "round-trip" editing, >>> so that you could edit with an IDE/code editor, and then the >>> visual editor, and then the code editor again, without loss. The >>> back-end, which would read and manipulate the LZX files, would >>> be written in Java, and would run in the same context as OL itself. >>> >>> What do you think of this approach? Right now it's just a concept. >>> >>> - D. >>> >> >> I did thought experiments and prototyped a system like this bit >> back. It is doable, with a set of limitations as to what can be >> edited. You couldn't see the effects of editing Javascript in the >> IDE (you'd have to compile because eval isn't strong in there) >> but you could see the effects of adding and removing attributes, >> changing layouts, etc. To me the concept hinged on building >> components - classes with specifications that could be read by >> the IDE - that would become available to use. It wouldn't just be >> any set of LZX code, but an easily extendable ever growing list >> of "prepared" classes. This way the parameters to any class could >> be known and displayed properly. >> >> I saw something similar to RealBasic's IDE coming out of this >> approach. >> >> I had this running in Blooms (a laszlo templating system) and >> although i wasn't targetting reading from LZX - it was going to >> choose a Blooms language intermediate that would render to LZX - >> I had some interesting ideas as to how the layout of the IDE >> would work. For instance, since the blooms thing has "server" >> transforms that build XML datasources, datasources would also be >> included in the IDE in a "cloud" that you'd pair and move around >> in groups of their functionality (in python fwiw). From a visual >> standpoint, i thought it would be nice to describe complete >> applications with server side resources in a single environment. >> >> The proof of concept system properly read in the list of >> components and their attributes, and allowed you to make new >> components on screen, to prove it was possible. It seems so. >> >> Hope this is topical, >> James. >> >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >
