On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 15:17 -0500, Karl Fogel wrote: > Henning Eggers <[email protected]> writes: > > I would just like to start the discussion (again?) how to provide a good > > test-drive experience on production that makes it easy for people just > > to go ahead and try it out. Maybe it is as simple as providing real > > project deletion. > > What is the reason we don't provide project deletion, again? (I.e., is > it policy, or is it just not gotten around to implementing it yet?)
The project may have valuable artefacts for the community. We do not deactivate a project with code, or bugs for example because they are valuable to more that just the owner. If the owner does not want to maintain the project, he can give it to Registry Admins, or another user. Given the high number of still-born projects (no artefacts), I think we should consider allowing these project be deactivated on user demand or automatically after 12 months. -- __Curtis C. Hovey_________ http://launchpad.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
