On August 27, 2009, Curtis Hovey wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 15:17 -0500, Karl Fogel wrote: > > Henning Eggers <[email protected]> writes: > > > I would just like to start the discussion (again?) how to provide a > > > good test-drive experience on production that makes it easy for people > > > just to go ahead and try it out. Maybe it is as simple as providing > > > real project deletion. > > > > What is the reason we don't provide project deletion, again? (I.e., is > > it policy, or is it just not gotten around to implementing it yet?) > > The project may have valuable artefacts for the community. We do not > deactivate a project with code, or bugs for example because they are > valuable to more that just the owner. If the owner does not want to > maintain the project, he can give it to Registry Admins, or another > user. > > Given the high number of still-born projects (no artefacts), I think we > should consider allowing these project be deactivated on user demand or > automatically after 12 months.
I thought we had an agreement on that one. But note that this wouldn't solve the above use-case since in the test-drive case, there would be artefacts. -- Francis J. Lacoste [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
