DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: << > LBJ had huge appetites. And he was not discriminating. But ladies were > definitely not his thing I disagree. He had a very active libido and he was very proud of his "Johnson". >> I think the first post was referring to the difference between ladies and other women, right? Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 Kathy E
- L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 moonshine
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 hallinan
- Re: L&I Re: law-issues-digest V1 #695 DocCec
